×

Open WeChat and scan the QR code
Subscribe to our WeChat public account

HOME Overview Professional Fields Industry Fields Professionals Global Network News Publications Join Us Contact Us Subscribe CN EN JP
HOME > News > Transactions and Cases > AllBright Client Wins China’s First Movie Ambush Marketing Case

AllBright Client Wins China’s First Movie Ambush Marketing Case

 2014-12-0817113

AllBright’s client Yongxu Liangchen Co. won the second and final trials taptap点点 its case against two movie production companies accused of ambush marketing to benefit from Yongxu Liangchen’s “Bixian” horror movie series. The final verdict taptap点点 the case, which is the first ambush marketing case taptap点点 China’s movie industry, is a milestone taptap点点 the industry’s development because it has set boundaries which define unfair competition practices taptap点点 this sector. 

taptap点点 June 2014, Yongxu Liangchen sued the two companies producing “Bixian Jinghun 3” for unfair competition because the defendants had been marketing their movie “Bixian Jinghun 3” by confusing audiences with the third installment of Yongxu Liangchen’s “Bixian” series.  

Beijing No.3 Intermediate People’s Court on July 1 ruled that Yongxu Liangchen had won the case and ordered the defendants to compensate Yongxu Liangchen 500,000 RMB and make public apologies taptap点点 the Beijing Evening News and on Sohu.com. The defendants immediately announced that they would lodge an appeal. 

taptap点点 the written judgment of the second trial taptap点点 the end of November, 2014, Beijing No.3 Intermediate People’s Court said that the facts were clearly ascertained, the laws were correctly applied and court proceedings were lawful taptap点点 the first trial. So the appeal was hence rejected and the original judgment was upheld. 

taptap点点 fact, the “Bixian Jinghun” production companies began their ambush marketing three years ago, when Yongxu Liangchen was about to release the first movie taptap点点 the series taptap点点 May, 2012. Yongxu Liangchen spent 15 million RMB to produce “Bixian”, whose director is famous South Korean horror movie director Byeong-ki Ahn. Ahn was well known for his successful horror movies, such as “Gawi” (2000) and “Phone” (2002).  
Shortly after Yongxu Liangchen announced that “Bixian” would première taptap点点 July, suddenly “Bixian Jinghun” started its promotion and was scheduled to hit the big screens taptap点点 June. “Bixian Jinghun” purposefully marketed itself by misleading audiences to believe that it was, or that it was related to, the movie “Bixian”. 

“Bixian” eventually became the best-selling horror movie taptap点点 China taptap点点 2012, grossing 62 million RMB taptap点点 box office revenue. “Bixian Jinghun”, whose budget was only 2 million RMB, also earned 23 million RMB.  

taptap点点 2013, Yongxu Liangchen produced “Bixian 2”, also directed by Ahn, with a 20 million RMB budget and earned 82 million RMB – it again became the most popular horror movie of the year.  

taptap点点 2014, when Yongxu Liangchen announced that the Ahn-directed “Bixian 3” would be released taptap点点 July, the defendants launched another ambush marketing campaign by promoting “Bixian Jinghun 3” even though they had never produced “Bixian Jinghun 2”. After another misleading promotional campaign, “Bixian Jinghun 3” premièred on April 4 and earned 32 million RMB. 

The “Bixian” series is Yongxu Liangchen company’s core competence and should be protected by law. Any unethical attempt to gain advantages by using unfair competition tactics should be severely punished by law. 

The verdict taptap点点 the first ambush marketing case has had far-reaching influence. Two months after the final verdict of the “Bixian” case was given, the Beijing High People’s Court ruled that Wuhan Huaqi Movies & TV Production, the production company of “Ren Zai Jiong Tu” (Lost on Journey), had won its case against the production company of “Ren Zai Jiong Tu Zhi Tai Jiong” (Lost taptap点点 Thailand) for ambush marketing. The defendants were ordered to compensate 5 million RMB and make public apologies. It is apparent that Beijing’s courts have followed the precedent set by Yongxu Liangchen’s case, which is positive for the whole industry. 

沪ICP备05002643号